Question: 1 / 1390

If a patient insists on extracting vital teeth in the lower right region despite no pathology, what diagnosis is appropriate?

A. Odontalgia

B. Referred pain

C. Trigeminal neuralgia

The choice of trigeminal neuralgia as the appropriate diagnosis in the scenario of a patient insisting on extracting vital teeth without evidence of pathology is relevant due to the nature of the pain typically associated with this condition. Trigeminal neuralgia is characterized by sudden, severe, and often brief episodes of facial pain, usually in response to specific triggers. Patients may misinterpret their pain as originating from specific teeth or dental structures, even when those teeth are healthy.

In this case, the patient’s strong insistence on extracting vital teeth may stem from a perception of pain in that area, but without any pathological findings, which aligns with how trigeminal neuralgia presents. The pain does not actually arise from an identifiable dental issue but rather from the nerve pathways involved in facial sensation, particularly the trigeminal nerve.

Understanding this condition helps clarify why extraction may seem justified to the patient, despite the clinical evidence indicating otherwise. The absence of visible pathology supports the possibility of a nerve-related pain rather than an issue strictly related to the teeth or gums, highlighting the importance of evaluating pain sources accurately in dental practice.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

D. Periodontal disease

Next

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy